論文資料・未整理(password)

Bryson JM, Patton MQ, Bowman RA. (2011).
Working with evaluation stakeholders: A rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit.
Eval Program Plann. 2011 Feb;34(1):1-12. [PDF]

Borman, G. D., Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., Chamberlain, A. M., Madden, N. A., & Chambers, B. (2005). Success for All: First-year results from the national randomized field trial. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 1-22. [PDF]

Borman, G. D., Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., Chamberlain, A. M., Madden, N. A., & Chambers, B. (2005). The National Randomized Field Trial of Success for All: Second-year outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 673-696. [資料]

 

Cook, T. D. (2002). Randomized experiments in educational policy research: A critical examination of the reasons the educational evaluation community has offered for not doing them.  Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 175-199. [PDF]

 

Riger, S. (1993). What’s wrong with empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 279-292. [Reading]

Stroul, B., & Blau, G. (eds.) (2008). The System of Care Handbook. Paul H. Brooks Publishing.

Hernndez, M., & Hodges, S. (2003). Building upon the theory of change for systems of care. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 19-26.

Brannan, A., Brashears, F., Gyamfi, P., & Manteuffel, B. (2012). Implementation and development of federally-funded systems of care over time. American Journal of Community Psychology, 49, 467-482. [Reading 

Cook, J., & Kilmer, R.  (2012). Systems of Care: New partnerships for community psychology, 49, 393-403. American Journal of Community Psychology, 49, 393-403. [Reading]

Bickman, L., Noser, K., & Summerfelt, W. T. (1999). Long-term effects of a system of are on children and adolesents. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 26, 185-202. [Reading]

Bickman, L. (1996). A continuum of care: More is not always better. American Psychologist, 51, 689-701. [Reading]

Weisz, J., Han, S., & Valeri, S. (1997). More of What?: Issues raised by the Fort Bragg Study. American Psychologist, 52, 541-545. [Reading]

Hoagwood, K. (1997). Interpreting nullity: The Fort Bragg Experiment: A comparative success or failure? American Psychologist, 52, 546-550. [Reading]

Sechrest, L., & Walsh, M. (1997). Dogma or Data: Bragging rights. American Psychologist, 52, 536-540. [Reading]

Behar, L. (1997). The Fort Bragg Evaluation: A snapshot in time. American Psychologist, 52, 557-559. [Reading]

Friedman, R., & Burns, B. (1996). The Evaluation of the Fort Bragg Demonstration Project: Alternative interpretation of the findings. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 23, 128-136. [Reading]

Bickman, L. (1997). Resolving issues raised by the Fort Bragg Evaluation: New directions for mental health services research. American Psychologist, 52, 562-565. [Reading]

 

Social and Community Intervention

Cowen (1973) reading 1.

Kelly (1977) reading 2.

Bloom (1980) reading 3.

Iscoe (1984) reading 4.

Gesten & Jason (1987) reading 5.

Levine & Toro (1993) reading 6.

Heller (1990) reading 7.

Reppucci (1999) reading 8.

Chaney, B. (2016). Reconsidering findings of “No Effects” in Randomized Control Trials: Modeling differences in treatment impacts. American Journal of Evaluation, 37, 45-62. [Reading]

Chen, H., & Rossi, P. (1980). The multi-goal, theory-driven approach to evaluation: A model linking basic and applied social science. Social Forces, 59, 106-122. [Reading]

Kalaft, J. & Illback, R. (1998). A qualitative evaluation of school-based family resource and youth service centers. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 573-604. [Reading]

Lipsey, M. (1993). Theory as method: Small theories of treatments. New directions in program evaluation, 57, 5-38. [Reading]

Lipsey, M., & Cordray, D. (2000). Evaluation methods for social intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 345-375. [Reading]

Lipsey, M., Crose, S., Dunkle, J., Pollard, J., & Stobart, G. (1985). Evaluation: The state of the art and the sorry state of the science. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 27, 7-28. [Reading]

Jason, L., McCoy, K., Blanco, D., & Zolik, E. (1980). Decreasing dog litter: Behavioral consultation to help a community group. Evaluation Review, 4, 355-359. [Reading]

Jason, L., Zolik, E., & Matese, F. (1979). Promoting dog owners to pick up dog dropping. American Journal of Community Psychology, 7,  339-351. [Reading]

Shadish, W., & Cook, T. (2009). The renaissance of field experimentation in evaluating interventions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 607-629. [Reading]

Sriven, M. (1991). Pros and cons about goal-free evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 12, 55-76. [Reading]

Flay, B. R. (1986). Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Preventive Medicine, 15, 451-474. [Reading]

Flay, B. R. et al. (2005). Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6, 151-175. [Reading]

Yoshikawa, H. (2006). Placing community psychology in the context of the social, health and educational sciences: Directions for interdisciplinary research and action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 31-34. [Reading]

Yoshikawa, H. (1994). Prevention as cumulative protection: Effects of early family support and education on chronic delinquency and its risks. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 28-54. [Reading]

Shinn, M., & Toohey, S. (2003). Community contexts of human welfare. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 427-459. [Reading]

Maton, K., Perkins, D., & Saegert (2006). Community Psychology at the crossroads: Prospects for interdisciplinary research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 9-21. [Reading]

Seidman, E. (1988). Back to the future, community psychology: Unfolding a theory of social intervention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 3-24. [Reading]